Quote:
Originally Posted by shokdee
"I read about it on the internet. I don't know for sure". Why even bring this up? I'd have thought David was way above this kind of personal attack. His lengthy comments about his various psychic readings just sounded like egotistical one-upmanship to me - totally irrelevant to the point of the interview. 
As I understand it David disagrees with whatever Dr Deagle MIGHT have said (since he didn't actually listen to the phone call) with 3 arguments.
First, if anything was going to happen, he (David) would have had visions himself. He didn't, so it can't be possible.
Second, the ETs won't allow anything bad to happen to the planet. (Not sure which ETs he has in mind here? Maybe the ones that supposedly struck Lanz with lightning even though that story is considered a myth).
Third, the Illuminati types would never destroy infrastructure (roads, buildings, bridges). He points to 9/11 and the way the bad guys imploded the buildings into their own footprint as an example of this (I find this argument to be tasteless).
I was also upset when he made comparisons to 9/11 and Katrina saying people harp on about 9/11 too much since Katrina was more devastating in terms of deaths and damage. Uh yes, but Katrina was a natural disaster and 9/11 was orchestrated. Dying from natural causes vs preplanned murder. There are other points I could mention but I'll stop now as I know I'll be flamed like mad for what I've already posted. |
first off, you've completely missed the point david was getting at. he didn't say deagle did those things, he's simply stating that because those things have been circulating around that you should take them into consideration. that doesn't mean assume their true, which david didn't do anyway. personal attack? i didn't think so. if you want to say david attacked deagle, then you'd also have to argue that david attacked himself because he pointed out some of the things that people say about his own life. of course, it's nonsense to say david attacked himself, so you can you say he attacked deagle?
secondly, he brings up his various psychic readings because you have to look at the track record of the person sharing the information. david has a great track record, so obviously he is going to make sure people know that. that doesn't mean david is always right, rather it means david has established some credibility regarding his psychic abilities. again, that doesn't mean you should believe everything david says, but don't automatically dismiss it just because you think his past readings are irrelevant.
in regards to david's reasons why he believes deagle is wrong..
1)david never said it was impossible for these things to happen because he didn't have the visions. he said he would PROBABLY have similar visions if ti were true. if you need to know the difference between probably and necessarily then i understand why you've misinterpreted most of what david says
2)ETs will not allow any more nuclear explosions because the effects are felt not only on our plane of existence, but reach into others as well. there are MANY sources who support this idea, and i agree with them.
3)i'm not sure how you don't make the connection here. if they didn't care about realestate, the PTB would have let the towers fall sideways to erase doubt of a controlled demolition. obviously, they chose to save the surrounding buildings (there's a lot of money invested in those buildings) and many people have used this information to debunk the official 9/11 story. why give the people reason to doubt what you're telling them unless you have specific reasons to leave the surrounding buildings unharmed?
lastly, i totally agree with his comparison of katrina vs 9/11. you assume katrina was a natural disaster. can you prove this? either way, it's irrelevant. 9/11 could have been prevented, yes. but katrina could have also been prevented, or at least the damage minimized. we've spent how much money on terror? and what has it gotten us? nothing. had we spent that money on building up our defenses against natural disasters, thousands of lives could have been saved and millions of dollars worth of property as well. absolutely we should be concentrating on those that cause the most death and destruction. i mean come on, haven't you figured out that the war on terror doesn't exist? let's at least spend our time and money on something that can have a positive impact