Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - T1v83: Could Hillary ever become President?

Bill Ryan · 09-09-2008, 03:54 PM

Hi, All:

The reference to consider here is the material Dan Burisch debriefed to Kerry and myself on 10 December 2007, over a five hour period - which was one of the more extraordinary and fascinating few hours I've excperienced in recent years.

For anyone unfamiliar with this testimony, read here.

At first we assumed this was fully confidential, but several months later Dan gave us the okay to report the essential details.

Since the identification of t1v83 [Timeline 1, varient 83] as the most probable future, several important things changed:

* Mike McConnell (DNI) published the 3 December 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, stating (in summary) that Iran was not a threat.

* Benazir Bhutto was assassinated - and subsequent to this there has been regime change in Pakistan.

* Hillary was not the democratic candidate for President or Vice-President.

It's reasonable to conclude, therefore, that t1v83 has been broken (Dan Burisch himself now assumes this, as do we).

But:

The nature of timelines is such that - especially at the moment (if that's not too subtle a twist of the English language) - they are rather like a braided rope, composed of several different tangled strands. One 'strand' can influence an adjacent one if it is too 'close'.

In practice, this means that there can be an apparent diversion from a timeline, and (rather like pulling off a Freeway to a rest area and then rejoining the Freeway again) one can later find oneself back in the 'main flow'.

'Flow' is not too bad an analogy... Jim Sparks refers to the flow of time (based on information from his abductors) as being like the flow of a giant river. It can be changed, but it takes a huge amount of energy to do so, and has a tendency to flow back in the direction it was headed in the first place.

Note: all these analogies and metaphors are my own. Others (Henry??) may explain them in different and possibly more precise terms.

If there is a weird twist of fate and circumstances somehow conspire (or people conspire!) to enable Hillary to be on the ticket after all - then head for the hills, because we will be in trouble. The probailty of this, though, looks very low indeed. It's not zero - because weird things CAN happen - but may be less than 1%.

09-09-2008, 03:54 PM	#8
Bill Ryan Project Avalon Co Founder Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 353	Re: T1v83: Could Hillary ever become President? Hi, All: The reference to consider here is the material Dan Burisch debriefed to Kerry and myself on 10 December 2007, over a five hour period - which was one of the more extraordinary and fascinating few hours I've excperienced in recent years. For anyone unfamiliar with this testimony, read here. At first we assumed this was fully confidential, but several months later Dan gave us the okay to report the essential details. Since the identification of t1v83 [Timeline 1, varient 83] as the most probable future, several important things changed: * Mike McConnell (DNI) published the 3 December 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, stating (in summary) that Iran was not a threat. * Benazir Bhutto was assassinated - and subsequent to this there has been regime change in Pakistan. * Hillary was not the democratic candidate for President or Vice-President. It's reasonable to conclude, therefore, that t1v83 has been broken (Dan Burisch himself now assumes this, as do we). But: The nature of timelines is such that - especially at the moment (if that's not too subtle a twist of the English language) - they are rather like a braided rope, composed of several different tangled strands. One 'strand' can influence an adjacent one if it is too 'close'. In practice, this means that there can be an apparent diversion from a timeline, and (rather like pulling off a Freeway to a rest area and then rejoining the Freeway again) one can later find oneself back in the 'main flow'. 'Flow' is not too bad an analogy... Jim Sparks refers to the flow of time (based on information from his abductors) as being like the flow of a giant river. It can be changed, but it takes a huge amount of energy to do so, and has a tendency to flow back in the direction it was headed in the first place. Note: all these analogies and metaphors are my own. Others (Henry??) may explain them in different and possibly more precise terms. If there is a weird twist of fate and circumstances somehow conspire (or people conspire!) to enable Hillary to be on the ticket after all - then head for the hills, because we will be in trouble. The probailty of this, though, looks very low indeed. It's not zero - because weird things CAN happen - but may be less than 1%.