I just wanted to add to this thread that it seems it totally derailed from the original purpose of the OP.
It evolved into a discussion wether or not disabled or lesser fortunate should have the right to live or not. To me that's an aweful idea and I would like to urge everyone to get back to the original question here:
What about those in US who rely on welfare?
It's a good question, what about those that have no means of self sustainability? What will become of their welfare assets with this bailout passed?
It was a completely on target question and I would like to see some on target answers to them
