zorgon

Its a combination of facilities... There is so much involved that Jack and I have been going crazy trying to put it all together... I think seeing as there is interest I will make that my next big thread and start it off before the Gravity on the Moon thread... (Besides I have new data on the gravity from JAXA to add and John is working on the Pari Spolter angle...

Elements involved...
EISCAT - European Incoherent Scatter
HIPAS - High Power Auroral Stimulation Observatory
IRIS - Imaging Riometer for Ionospheric Studies

I will toss a few in here for now but will put it in order in a thread next week...

SURA Russian HAARP Facility



The Sura facility was commissioned in 1981. Using this facility, Russian researchers achieved extremely interesting results regarding the ionosphere behavior and discovered the effect of generation of low-frequency emission at the modulation of ionosphere current[1]. At the beginning, Soviet Defense Department mostly footed the bill. The American HAARP ionospheric heater is similar to the Sura facility. The HAARP project began in 1993.



SURA Emblem



Jicamarca Radio Observatory - Lima, Peru



Much bigger than HAARP


Although it is in Peru it is maintained by Cornell University

National MST Radar Facility
Gadanki, near Tirupati, in southern Andra Pradesh, India



This is for John

CHERENKOV RADIATION at night...

I will explain why this is important later I really don't want to toss it all in here at random as its taken months of work, but I know John will catch the significance in relation to the Moon (I will copy the other post below)


Here is an EISCAT faciltiy in Norway... same look... same function... only a different name... part of the 'network'



Here is an IRIS facility in Kilpisjärvi, Finland... same look... same function... only a different name... part of the 'network'





Well first YOU would have to break into a secure facility

But since the HAARP Signal is basically a radar network... controlling it is relatively simple by adjusting the frequencies of individual elements...

In fact they are getting so good at it they can literally draw in the Aurora



What is more interesting is that the scientists feel they can put up a new shield around the Earth should ours fail in case of a pole shift... (this same shield can be used for missile defense) or turned off over certain regions...

An off shoot of this technology is Star Trek like shields for spacecraft... something NASA already did papers on dated 1964 by GE

Shields for the Starship Enterprise: A Reality?


Image Credit: EISCAT

An artificial magnetosphere could be generated around manned space craft en route to the Moon or Mars to protect the occupants from the potentially lethal radiation in space from the Sun. A superconducting ring on board such a space craft could produce a magnetic field, or mini-magnetosphere, similar to the Earth’s, which would create a Star Trek like ‘deflector or plasma shield

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_...ic_Shield.html


ACTIVE SHIELDING CONCEPTS FOR THE IONIZING RADIATION IN SPACE

prepared for
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
R.C. GOOD, S.P. SHEN, AND N.F. DOW
Contract NASw-502 Final Report Rev. 31 Jan. 1964

Summary:

Studies have been made on the problems of shielding a spacecraft from ionizing radiation. Protons having energies between 100 and 1,000 MeV were taken as the radiation that should be excluded from the spacecraft's crew. An electromagnetic field system using a toroidal shaped spacecraft with a confined magnetic field is shown to be the lightest among those treated.

Weight calculations were made for spacecraft having crew spaces of 10, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 cu. ft. Spheres, cylinders, toruses, and spherical modules were selected for crew space configurations. Confined magnetic
fields surrounded each with passively shielded hatches added for passageway through the field. The weights were compared with a polyethylene passive shield by plotting the weight of shield system per unit volume of crew space against the Loading Index, the ratio of stopping power to a dimension of the system. Weights of hatch, superconducting coils, thermal insulation, and structural support were calculated.

In general, the active shield weight is only 20% that of the passive shield for high energy protons and for large sizes of spacecraft. The shield with a confined field weighs 30% of that for a shield using an unconfined field. If hatches are included, the use of spherical modules leads to spacecraft that are lighter than spheres, cylinders, or toruses. For spacecraft in the shape of a torus, a passively shielded hatch is not required because there are no
junctions between oppositely directed magnetic fields. In that case, a spacecraft in the shape of a torus is lighter than the other shapes.

ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19640021638_1964021638.pdf

So as we can see there is a LOT more to this than HAARP

But all anyone ever wants to do is blame HAARP for everything yet never look past their noses at what they are really doing... and just how far advanced they are...

As John said about 30... and they are building more. I have found most of them on Google Earth, but not the ones in Russia or China yet

King Lear... if you ARE interested I can use help sorting data

standauffish@earthlink.net