[cantaloupe]

If you listen to the c2c interview with these guys, they come off as caring and credible and they give away a great deal of their predictive info. At one point one of them says something to the effect of " it's too late to worry about giving away something we could charge for instead." Also, on the site it admonishes people that they should not subscribe unless the amount is a pittance for them. And they are very up-front about the fact that there is a great deal of interpretation involved in their work and that they are sometimes wrong about the language that appears around a particular event. The c2c interview seems to have a fairly generous amount of info, admittedly partial and of questionable meaning. In a way, because they are, during the interview, giving the benefit of their interpretive skill and openly allowing for the deficiencies of the system, I felt as though I didn't really need to subscribe. I don't think they are hucksters.