Quote:
Originally Posted by 2infinityandbeyond
Ahh if theres a chance everything may change for the worse is it really ethical to charge a person so they can be informed? (which may in fact save their life)
Word is, a nuke is going to hit. I wont tell you where unless you pay me. Its a loose analogy but but it gives an example of just how unethical it can be to be ethical.
This year is proving to be very stressfull.
|
Come on my friend, that is a total BS analogy. The Time Monks (whom I did subscribe to for a brief period of time and made quite a bit of useless 'fun ticket' FRN's off of tuggin'me'forelock') say they don't know what they are doing. If someone WANTS to pay for their analysis, as I did. The output of data is limited by an end user agreement. I have worked in situations where the data I held in my hand (not knowing the actual data) was 'secure'. I would not exchange that data with competitors.
Thwy don't claim to know anything so anyone whom pays them does so at their own risk. They can predict trends and events quite nicely with 20/20 hindsight. Except in the metals market......