I just finished reading DW's 2012 Politics III Economic Revolution. I stubbled upon David reading about Edgar Cayce a few years ago, and I've been following his research since then.
While I admire David's unwavering positivity in the face of dire circumstances,
I cannot agree with his seemingly naive interperitation of the financial meltdown and Obama's affiliation with PNAC goon Zbigniew Brzezinsky.
First Sentence quote:
"Economic changes are on everyone’s mind. Many are afraid. Don’t be. This is all part of a process we’re going through to heal the planet from negative power groups."
It is one thing to be positive, but this seems like burying your head in the sand while something awful is happening to your hindquarters.
As for Zbigniew, qoute:
"It [Georgia] has obvious tactical importance in this "Grand Chessboard," as Brezinski called it. [Richard Hoagland and I both believe Obama brought him in to "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer," and in no way does this mean he’s going to do what they say. Kennedy certainly didn’t, and most people can see Obama shares the same ideals.]"
This almost flippant dismissal of a man who espouses very dangerous ideals, smacks of something this juggernaut of a campaign Obama is running, has been characterised by: blind allegiance.
I live in St. Louis and have friends at Wash U. where the V.P. debate will be this thursday. I had considered obtaining tickets and perhaps even speaking to people about ZB or maybe MIchelle's CFR relationship, until I saw...
this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIenDGSAdPA
This scares me. Why does Obama have access to, and control over city appointed prosecutors?
As Kennedy himself said: "For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."
If you "lesser of two evils" voters must vote, consider writing in Ron Paul.