Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - Whistleblower intentions called into question here...

milk and honey · 09-28-2008, 08:19 PM

I don't recall the article referring to Michael St Clair or Project camelot. The general subject is definately open to question, yes, and the article is a potential eye opener for anyone who hasn't yet looked at the involvement of decietful terrestrial forces in the whole alien / UFO question. It's essential that everyone (including contactees) stay open to ALL information about aliens and UFOs including sources who are urging caution.

Anyone who is unwilling to hear from these sources, can fall into the same mental trap of unquestioned orthodoxy as fundamentalists always do. The process of HOW communities arrive at our conclusions (on every subject) is just as important as the common beliefs that we form. Because in the end, hopefully, nobody is forced to accept a consensus belief about aliens and UFOs (or anything else for that matter) but everyone must engage the same process. If we keep the PROCESS open and honest then the outcome has a far better chance of reflecting the truth about anything we seek.

For an excellent analysis of the "Overlooked Aspects Of the Alien Presence" see also montalk's article at this link http://montalk.net/notes/overlooked-...alien-presence

I believe it would be hard to find a better analysis written more succinctly than montalk's essay.

09-28-2008, 08:19 PM	#2
milk and honey Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 222	Re: Whistleblower intentions called into question here... I don't recall the article referring to Michael St Clair or Project camelot. The general subject is definately open to question, yes, and the article is a potential eye opener for anyone who hasn't yet looked at the involvement of decietful terrestrial forces in the whole alien / UFO question. It's essential that everyone (including contactees) stay open to ALL information about aliens and UFOs including sources who are urging caution. Anyone who is unwilling to hear from these sources, can fall into the same mental trap of unquestioned orthodoxy as fundamentalists always do. The process of HOW communities arrive at our conclusions (on every subject) is just as important as the common beliefs that we form. Because in the end, hopefully, nobody is forced to accept a consensus belief about aliens and UFOs (or anything else for that matter) but everyone must engage the same process. If we keep the PROCESS open and honest then the outcome has a far better chance of reflecting the truth about anything we seek. For an excellent analysis of the "Overlooked Aspects Of the Alien Presence" see also montalk's article at this link http://montalk.net/notes/overlooked-...alien-presence I believe it would be hard to find a better analysis written more succinctly than montalk's essay. Last edited by milk and honey; 09-28-2008 at 08:22 PM.