historycircus

Alexandra,

Good points, but I disagree that there are no wild places left. Satellites can peek anywhere, but there exist many places that whatever is left of negative contol forces won't be paying attention to. There are rural places, even within 80-100 miles of our oldest metropolitan centers, that will not be given much scrutiny by the PTB or roving bands of scumbags. They will be distracted by the mass chaos that will come from the densly populated areas. Chances are, according to some of the theories, the PTB will be more worried about survival themselves. I'm a hard core skeptic, but the existance of underground facilities is something that has recently hit mainstream news outlets - creating, in my mind at least, a confirmation that the PTB know that short term survival concerns are a fruitful avenue of concern.

I don't know where you grew up, but I grew up in the woods, on a major river draining into the Mississippi River. There were places that, over ten years, I was the only human being there. There are wild places left.

Alexandra does highlight a major concern - should we be considering large, fort like structures, or camoflaged structures that can somehow mask the resultant heat signatures (heat signatures will be what gives these hidden communities away from satellite imagery)?