BlueSojourn

Over the years, most of the "Conscious Creation" arguments - both for and against - seem to come from those who, for a multitude of reasons, have no clue whatsoever as to what it really means. The arguments tend to be limited only to the very narrow perceptions which the ego-mind is capable of grasping. The two absurd, worn-out, basic-facts-common-sense ("common sense" - now, there's an oxymoron for ya!) arguments presented by Mr. Topper and others are cases-in-point. By the way, how the heck did the notion of non-accountability ever get interjected into the discussion? 100% Accountability is one of the basic tenets of Conscious Creation - right along side the Law of Attraction and the Art of Allowing. And all three of those can only exist upon a foundation of TRUST.

The ego-mind cannot adequately grasp the concept of unconditional love either, yet there are very few who would actually argue that it doesn't exist. In other words, the ego proclaiming that Conscious Creation is bogus (no matter how wordy that proclamation may be) is tantamount to, say, an alligator proclaiming that unconditional love is nonsense. There are areas within human beingness where the left brain is simply unequipped to venture or to even translate. This is undoubtedly one of the primary reasons that, down through the ages, the Gnostics and the Alchemists have, for the most part, kept their gnosis to themselves.