Thanks for the words of everyone. But this right the point:
Send a message to a community, that becomes to use software that cannot be controlled by anyone, and noone, that begin to get knowledge of new "options" to make researchs with a decent secure operating system, seems to be "dangerous" from someone who are feeling comfortable with propietary software.
to prevent something from happening? no doubt!
With Vega, the forum activity cannot be traced, or located in space or time, including the incognito mode, thsi real "dangerous" for whom likes to control others.
I get angry because of the "technique" applied. "shape" discussion, more than "deep tip".
If you want to attack something that can change the way of communication in some point, the "enemy" will attack where the "shape" is present. Not in the things that cannot manage.
I Think Mr Artie is against Vega, because of his fear of the "new things", and how he has not any kind of knowledge about free and open source software, the spirit behind this movement ( probably he is another Microsoft monkey, why not? ) he uses what he consider "dangerous", but seems to be very "happy" with his actual operating system. I didnt see using any kind of open technology, so he prefers to use closed systems, with "nice names"...
but, he likes "evidences" so here it is a "important reason" to use Vega...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSAKEY
Other example, would be, based Vega on FreeBSD Technologies, who has a devil kid as a logotype.... check here...
http://images.google.com.ar/images?q...N&hl=es&tab=wi
How can say that FreeBSD people are satanist?.....
please!!!!
be honest....u are debunking the project, because of your FEAR! balcanic boy!
P.