kenticus

i first read behold a pale horse in the early 90's. At first it seemed so engrossing, so chock full of answers to my questions, that i was floored.

I went back over it a few years later as i got deeper into Lazar's story & majestic & at that point i saw some flaws in his account. As the years have gone on, & i have found that some of his central tenets were either complete falsehoods or a mix of real & (disinfo?) fake. This has caused me to reappraise him as someone who most likely glimpsed a peek behind the curtain during his navy years & let his core story grow into the monster it has become.

Was he a patriot? I believe so.
Was he a unwitting conduit for disinformation? In later years, i totally think so.

I dont want the (numerous) falsehoods he has put forth as truth make his legacy that of a Rick Doty type.

I prefer to think of him as a John Lear type, & i mean that with great respect.

The one thing he did say in BAPH was that either all the ET stuff he was shown was true, or it was ALL A LIE. Put forth by our government for god knows what ( see Werner Von Braun for an idea why).

This is my first post here after lurking for a while & i think im going to fit in here, thank you for having me.