02-12-2010, 11:37 AM
|
#19
|
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
|
Re: Giant UFOs Around SUN UPDATED!! FEB 10
Firinn: You brought up an important issue: The obvious change of the green radiation pattern, used as background to highlight the “artefacts”. It clearly proves a manipulation of the pictures. You “smell a rat”, maybe indicating that NASA is trying to play a game:
By manipulating the pictures, but leaving recognizable traces, they set up a scenario in which we are herded to believe that there are giant UFO`s around the sun!
This hypothesis does not have merit, which can be proven by looking into it:
Fact is:
1. NASA posts pictures with anomalies.
2. NASA later removes the pictures, manipulates them and reposts them again.
3. The manipulation diminishes the appearances of the anomalies
4. Without the first posted reference picture it would be hard to even recognize the anomalies in the manipulated picture.
5. NASA claims that the anomalies are compression artefacts and they are “rectifying” the problem.
That is standard dumbification procedure for the normal public. To assume that it is been done intentionally to only draw attention to the fact that something with UFO`s is going on at the sun, is just ridiculous.
The question remains: Why are they not removing the "artefacts" completely? I don’t know.
But I do know that with 99.99 % probability these are NOT artefacts. You might still reply: Well that’s what NASA wants you to think!
Well, here it comes:
This is from Lockheed. Same "artefact". But we are still in the big conspirational USA, so here is this:
This is a picture from the Japanese HINODE satellite. Do you see the "artefacts"?
Zoom:
So, we have the same optical phenomena of gigantic spheres appearing near the sun. This is from a different satellite, from a different organization in a different country.
Source: http://solar-b.nao.ac.jp/latest/xrt_ffi_latest.gif
For me that closes the discussion of “compression artefacts”, outdated satellites or a NASA setup.
Be sceptic, but not ignorant.
.
Last edited by bashi; 02-12-2010 at 11:36 PM.
|
|
|