Quote:
Originally Posted by MANCHILD
|
By side stepping the question I asked... about your perception of receiving a personal threat to yourself from me. I can assume you have realised the absurdity of the statement you made.
From the quote above I see you are still selling the doom and gloom scenario. Shouldn't you have said.....
"Please check out this video about the
LIKELY HOOD of a terrorist attack".
For some reason you omitted LIKELY HOOD but chose to use the word
"A." Implying a
spesific attack or
known attack. Considering your propencity for the dramatic I doubt it's to do with semantics.
Anyways, I watched the 43 second clip of a 2 hour
Intelligence Senate Select Committee hearing.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chair Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) asks witnesses Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta, DIA Director Lieutenant General Ronald L. Burgess, Jr., USA, and Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research, Ambassador John R. Dinger what the likelihood of another terrorist attempted attack on the U.S. Homeland in the next 3 to 6 months; high or low? View the complete hearing here http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/id...
The specific question of the
likely hood was answered with "attempted attack the priority is certain." The common man in the street could tell you that. After all terrorists will do what terrorist do.
Let us put your video clip to some perspective.
So your point is ?