Quote:
|
The theory behind how MMS works is in fact more of a hypothesis, as no clinical test conducted by qualified and appropriately equipped scientific institution are publicly available to my knowledge (and a question would remain how trustworthy such research would be once made public), and MDs, in whose hands it should be in in the first place if we lived in a sane world, won't touch it with a barge pole
|
So many ways this statement rubbed me the wrong way. I agree getting some more appropriately equipped scientific clinical testing would be idea, but the rest is way off course in my opinion. Let's first address this in a more realistic manner as to how it applies today. Many of our medications and supplements are tested "appropriately" and approved by the FDA, but yet create death, harm, addicition and unnecessary repeat customers needing another drug to deal with side effects of the one prescribed to them.
My doctor approving something for me is a personal judgement call, because he/she may recommend the same drugs that may result in the following categories listed above. If you ask a doctor about a homeopathic medication, most of them would be clueless as to what to advise because they have no training in homepathics (due to this lack funding for "appropriate" clinical testing), and will often recommend against it. This is due to feeling there's no substantial testing...There's nothing sane about that in my world.
Pharmaceutical companies and the strategic incentives they sometime offer to doctors for recommending or using some of there products proves how much your health may really matter to some doctors, compared to profit.
The FDA is a repeat offender of failing the public in this regard, so MMS being viewed with less credentials, data, adequate testing and safety protocols is mostly a farce. Notice how the drugs the FDA approve have consistently surfaced as more harmful than the ones that are not.
The second leading cause of death is Hospitals/Medications/Wrongful diagnosis.