Quote:
Originally Posted by Stargazer1965
You know I did not name this thread correctly.....but Its breathing well on it's own....Peace
|
It was a thought you had....you expressed it...therefore the thread IS accurately titled.
I would like to point out that there is a huge difference between questioning the
legitimacy of a whistleblower...and questioning the
validity and
accuracy of what they're claiming in the interview.
A lie that one believes to be true and volunteers the info...does not make one a
liar.
Also...a threat, attack, surveillance etc
does not automatically
validate what they are claiming.
So do not confuse the critique of the information being presented as a critique of the individual presenting the information.
Personally, I think Kerry gets too involved with the information being presented and is somewhat emotionally attached to what is being said...both when it confirms her beliefs and when it conflicts with her beliefs. A good interviewer....someone allowing another to really present their own facts and opinions...asks questions from a
non-dualistic perspective.
If I could make a single suggestion on any and all future interviews....it would be to ask the whistleblower this question...
Why should anyone watching believe what you are saying?
The answer to that...or more specifically the
reaction to that question would speak
volumes about the person being asked.