Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_A
Hi TOKYO ROSE,
Interesting post. The easiest way of finding out about Novel or Schneider is for someone to go and confirm the Dulce base and if it exists.
As the Camelot site has the disclaimer posted about not being responsible for what interviewees say, I also find myself thinking in a similar way as you do about 'grilling' the people who claim to 'know'. Once the Camelot team tried to do this with Steven Greer.
There is a program on BBC World called 'Hard Talk' which I really enjoy with Stephen Sakur, who intelligently places the interviewee under pressure and isn't afraid to ask tough questions which put the guest under pressure. I'm sure that if Camelot used this tack, many so called 'whistleblowers' would refuse to be interviewed by them, which forme would be better as it would seperate the wheat from the chaff.
It appears that there are many so called 'experts' who I reckon are just repeaters and not whistleblowers as such who are trying to cash in. We need to get rid of these people as they are not helping the truth movement.
Give me ten minutes with them, I'm synical, I'll find out if they're telling the truth!
Best regards,
Steve
(It seems that everybody named in this post are called Steve!!)
|
I don't think the technique used on Hard Talk would necessarily sort out the wheat from the chaff, it would just favour those who do better in that style of interview. Many people might indeed not want to be interviewed in that style, especially those who have been through trauma and may not want to put themselves through that to prove themselves, being pressurized and the validity questioned of things they know they have been through. Yes of course these people will be questioned and will come under pressure if trying to speak out, but B&K aren't judge/jury/executioner so to speak, the people they're interviewing aren't being interrogated. Tough questions need to be asked, but they can't push someone in a corner unless they know they're deceptive at least.
It's akin to examination techniques, some work for some, not for others and don't necessarily prove intelligence or aptitude for everyone taking them. Perhaps B&K need to be able to adapt their interview style during interviews as to how they think will get the most information.