Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulapops
I think they have a balanced message purely by running the forum.
|
They have done a great thing by putting this forum up and inviting people here. Aside from that, it's the members who make this forum.
Their message is based 100% on whistleblowers and the "official reports".
Below is what I wrote to Bill on the Bill Ryan's thread:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sjkted
One strategy by TPTB to prevent disclosure is when there is a big incident to intentionally write up a bona fide document on the incident that is filled with disinformation and then give it to a certain number of insiders, whom they know will eventually leak the document. There will then be another document describing the real incident which is then given to a substantially smaller number of people and heavily controlled.
This serves two purposes: (1) TPTB know that if there is a serious incident that some leaks cannot be prevented and that people like us will be researching it and trying to find out what happened. By leaking an official document filled with disinfo, it passifies us into not looking for the real information and convinces us we have found all we are looking for. (2) It causes us to believe a lie which can be used in the future to manipulate anyone who has been briefed by the "disinfo" document.
My point in stating this is that if this is the case, nearly all of your sources would correlate the same information, since they had intentionally been given the disinfo document. They would believe what they were telling you and their documentation would be official. The only way this could be disproven would be by trying to correlate the details with outside sources.
|
Because this really does happen, it is critical to have outside sources that are not based on black ops whistleblowers.
--sjkted