View Single Post
Old 01-22-2010, 02:37 AM   #8
TraineeHuman
Avalon Senior Member
 
TraineeHuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
Default Re: CLIFF HIGH taking a skeptical look at whistleblowers and questions camelot AGAIN!

As far as I understand, Cliff High's whole argument that time travel doesn't exist is based on the fact that "time doesn't exist". I agree that strictly speaking, the only time that really exists is the eternal now.

However, Cliff's argument seems to be that because we can only be in the eternal now, therefore we can never move to or experience any moment in the future. This is based on the idea that "the future" must ultimately be a meaningless concept, since only "the now" is meaningful, according to Cliff.

However, in whatever sense "the future" isn't a totally meaningless concept, Cliff's argument simply doesn't apply, and therefore doesn't work.

(This isn't the only valid simple criticism that I believe can be made of Cliff's argument, but I'll leave it there for now.)
TraineeHuman is offline   Reply With Quote