Quote:
Originally Posted by 3optic
There is some good information on Jones' site.. which makes it all the more disconcerting when he convolutes his message with the hysterical tone he imbues it with. Have you heard his broadcast during the Y2K debacle? He seemed to knowingly misrepresent facts in the most irresponsible way imaginable. Since then he has refined his approach but the distinction I make between the two is this: Wilcock seems to me to have a sincerity and benign intent from his actions even if his information isn't always correct. Jones has often insulted and belittled guests with none of the "truth" or rationality you claim he represents.
|
Rationality is not defined my "tone", but by logical accuracy of what he means. I don't care if he talks, screams or communicate via smoke signs, all I care is if his information is true or not.
Yes, I prefer a rude truthsayer instead of a pleasant liar.
Who cares if you or anybody else feel offended? Take your hurt feelings somewhere else. Man up or **** off.