[Harper]

I thought a lot about whether it was worthy or not that someone who was poorer, financially speaking, would have more truth and I don't think it stands up to examination. You could put out a whole load of dis-info for free, like for instance Fox news or any channel or medium. You could request money from your followers etc....but who can prove that you need it?

You could charge 1000 bucks for a CD because thats how much 20 years of research cost you... but does it mean its not worth it?

David Icke could be paid by the government and how would anyone know?? I of course just made that up but who is to say either way who is deliberately lying or telling the truth as they know it but the truth turns out to be lies fed to them by an interested 3rd party.

I don't have the answer but because something is cheap or free does not at all exclude it from dis-info. In fact you might want to question the freer it is the more likely perhaps the person has an income that you don't know about.

I never understood Bill's arguement that their stuff was above reproach because the production values were terrible. Anyone can make a terrible video. Its surely easier to make a terrible video?????

I am just following a logical arguement and the examples above are just examples to play with and do not represent the opinions of the author -- hehehehe ...

Anyway something I think about - a lot !