Re: David Wilcock - The open letter
Hoagland and David Wilcock work together often. I can't wait to see what will be the response of DW for all this new information that tends to lean the evidence towards this being a missile.
Honestly I thought about the fact that once out of the atmosphere a missile could in theory whistle about loads of gas at very high speeds due to the lack of air to resist it , which would also explain the perfect concentric circles as there would be a lack of air to dissapate it... I am not however sure that the Bulava missiles fly outside of the atmosphere.
The visibility would not be possible from many angles because to them it would only look like a curved contrail .. while only at a specific angle (this case norway) it would look like a spiral.
The problem however.. and it is a very big problem is that this kind of spiral has never ever before seen created by a missile, not even close. Another huge problem is that the mathematical probability of a missile failing with a perfect spiral for the first time ever EXACTLY over a HAARP facility which is able to produce such phenomena in the sky .. is almost zero.
I have to conclude that there are higher forces in play .. there is just too much coincidence for my liking.. After taking into account both this post and Hoaglands evidence I still lean over the electromagnetics explanation.
But very often .. both explanations may be valid. What if there was a missile launch targeted at the electromagnetic spiral?
|