Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - David Wilcock

TraineeHuman · 01-08-2010, 01:52 AM

Bashi, your deduction that the tetrahedral object was a spaceship is quite ingenious, as is your argument regarding the extremely good news it implies.

Kind of reminds me of the intuitive brilliance of a fellow named Wilcock. I’m no expert on atmospheric physics. But wouldn’t it be well within the capacity of HAARP to create a holographic simulation of a missile fired from the location of EISCAT? David seems to offer enough evidence for this being so, despite his lack of technical expertise. For instance, doesn’t David apparently prove by simple trigonometry that the origin of the spiral was precisely at EISCAT? Surely three-dimensional dynamics and simple trigonometry is all that's needed to fix the location of the origin?

01-08-2010, 01:52 AM	#29
TraineeHuman Avalon Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 174	Re: David Wilcock - The open letter Bashi, your deduction that the tetrahedral object was a spaceship is quite ingenious, as is your argument regarding the extremely good news it implies. Kind of reminds me of the intuitive brilliance of a fellow named Wilcock. I’m no expert on atmospheric physics. But wouldn’t it be well within the capacity of HAARP to create a holographic simulation of a missile fired from the location of EISCAT? David seems to offer enough evidence for this being so, despite his lack of technical expertise. For instance, doesn’t David apparently prove by simple trigonometry that the origin of the spiral was precisely at EISCAT? Surely three-dimensional dynamics and simple trigonometry is all that's needed to fix the location of the origin?