[TAXMASTER]

here is my take whether anyone cares or not. ( i am a tri-plegic and 1 handed typer so excuse mu punctuation)

i have followed for several years. i first came across burisch on earthfiles and was fascinated with all the detail and really wanted to believe. after he opened his own web site, i started to scrutinise his presentation. first let me say that i am a fairly intelligent person with a healthy vocabulary and i have met many people who are much more intelligent than i and most people that want to be understood usually talk at a level that can be understood by most people. burisch loves to dangle a vocabulary that most find difficult to understand which tells me that he wants to impress everyone on his intelligence. there was a video of him receiving mail that was supposed to be unknown by him so he could get his reaction and it all looked staged plus how could he not know about the secret camera? then there were pictures of him delivering food to the poor with notations by marcia about how much dan gives to the poor and homeless. again somebody wanted to impress us on how spectacular he was. then there are all these copies of articles of incorporation and other items on display that anyone can get by paying the fees and filing out some paperwork. another way to impress those that don't know any different. he is probably really intelligent but has the emotional makeup of a child and badly needs to impress us for his own self esteem. i do not see the government employing such a time bomb for sensitive work.

in listening to deagle, he appears to have a vulnerable and sincere tone in many of his interviews. i think bill is taken by his personality and feels protective of it in some way. my gut instinct is that he has mental problems and is delusional but because he seems very functional and has had tremendous credentials, and is a super intelligent being, PC takes him as the real deal. i think that he thinks he is telling the truth and because of his displays of tears in some interviews, Bill believes he is genuine and feels a need to protect him.

i never believed or trusted leo zagami. he seemed like he was high on something during his interview because he could not answer the question without getting off subject.

i am still on the fence about ben fulford but he always reports on these wild things that can never be substantiated. for now i listen and take with a grain of salt.

dr pete peterson reminded me of the first time i used a condom. my partner was well satisfied and i was loaded but couldn't fire any rounds. in other words, i went through the motion and got nothing at the end. as my dad told me once he went to an "all you can eat" restaurant for $5 and they brought out the first plate that he finished rather handily and asked for another. the waitress said it would be another $5 and my dad said the sign said "all you can eat" and the waitress replied "that's right sir, that was all you could eat"

michael st claire has a good vibe to him and i think he is one of the good guys.

i used to think david icke was a kook but have changed my mind. i like his message and i can buy into just about anything he says but i am on the fence with the whole reptillian bloodline thing.

i think that sometimes the people here are a little too judgemental of bill and kerry. they are not professional reporters but overall i think they get the message out that each person has to tell. the only critisism i have is that if you are playing reporter, you must be objective and not get personally or emotionally involved with the whistleblowers otherwise you ruin your credibilty as an "objective reporter".

I welcome responses.

Namaste'