Quote:
Originally Posted by waitinginthewings
I remember on CNN with Wolf Blizer in Jan/09 he was doing his daily show, & he interview another journalist from another country via hologram. She appeared right on his stage, a few feet away from where he was standing. You could tell it was a hologram. He did announce that this was the first time on CNN doing a hologram interview. there appeared to be a energy field around the woman, which one could easily see.
So Moxie it came through on the TV screen.
|
Wow that's extremely naive thinking, that was not a 'hologram' in any shape whatsoever, the person in question was in a small enclosure, being filmed by a series of cameras positioned around their body so that their entire body would filmed in a quasi-3d manner(similar to how avatar was filmed in 3d but not nearly as good), then said footage would simply be broadcast on top of the set at the CNN news studio, so.. it was not that much different than when they interview a person off-location sorry. It was like interviewing a person on a green-screen off-location and then putting them on top of the set.
My opinion is that a hologram(a real life hologram, a project blue beam hologram) would be able to be filmed on a camera, simply because if it's a 3d image that can be seen and looks real in real life then it should be no problem capturing it on camera, some people say the 911 planes were holograms and you can easily see em on camera, and yes they do look sketchy. And what about the norway spiral and moscow pyramids? they look solid and real on camera.. a freaking floating pyramid in the sky, so yes holograms should be able to be filmed.