[Ravens and Doves]

[QUOTE=Philbert;213215pixel that is going to move across the footage, come up from the moon and lands on the Command Module is not a defect in the film or hair or scratch.
Also defects in film will not constantly through 300 frames,


Philbert and Friends,

It's good that we have this dialogue and agree to disagree on certian points without any personal attacks. Actually, we're on the same page regarding moon and planetary scrutuers. Other clips you have posted are better, In my opinion.

A few things I'd like to clear up. I said "a few frames" not 300 and I used the "human hair" term only as an example of the many difficulties that arise in making (especialy celluloid) copies of motion pictures. Also, pixels never move - but specks do.

If you've ever seen at the very end of a Hollywwod flick "Color by Delux." Delux was/is essentially Twentieth Century Fox's film processing lab - full post production facillity and archives. My brother was their chief engineer for many years before he went to Lazer Pacific when Kodak bought Lazer to be tech ready for the now unfolding, global, ULTRA high def digital broadcast AND theater output. Now, due to the economy thing, he's temping with ABC, NBC or whoever beeps his phone. I saw first hand a painstaking process:

Even through the processing and editing rooms are highly temp and humidity controlled, the back side of film is like an a vinyl record - in the cleanest of rooms, movement generates a static charge that can pull clothing fibers off a tech's shirt and unless the editing or other hardware is sophisticated enough to have a back-up, self film cleaning unit, tiny little dots appear and disapper.
I'm not saying that that is what is in the first NASA clip you posted, I'm just saying "camera artifacts" are something to consider regard SOME anomalies.


#4.Evidence of a manufactured fake horizon,

I have no clue as to why they would bother using a fake horizon when simpley leaving the real one in place would be easier and give the shots more credibility. Could the film have been shot through the NASA craft window? (the round portal frame getting in the way?)

*****

Many false presentations are out also. I did watch the video link you had posted here, and as much as this is going to hurt it has to be said. Many false video of U.F.Os have been created using cgi.
Another thing is that the video you posted shows a definite phenomenon in the footage that can not be identified. But the sad thing is that it has no credibility. It is a video shot by citizen here on earth.

*****


"...a video shot by citizen here on earth."

Ahem... ever heard of Project Camelot? It contains videos shot by citizens here on plenet Earth. I'm afraid it's the best we can do, for now.

The Santa Monica clip has already be studied for CGI and no evidence of that was found. Unfortunatly that analytical clip was taken off U-Toob or is very hard to find, but it does exist.

*****

That could be a government experiment or technology that was caught on the film in your link.

Remember false flags are used here on the people to confuse.

*****

I agree, but ANYTHING can be a government experiment at this point.

*****
Trust me there is plenty to put together, just not many people can work with the film archives.

*****

My bro and a woman I breifly dated and who is on my facebook worked with the raw footage of the Discovery Channel, Nat. Geo. and about one quarter of the entire A-list film and TV product (in one respect or another) in the Engish speaking world (that's one reason they got five Emmy's in a row). As Kerry Kassidy can tell you, post-production is highly problem intensive until that precious "final cut" is "in the can" (for the producer and distributors) and the negetives with a master positive go to archives.


******


Sorry your posted video link is just not a smoking gun to me there just is no smoke to follow.

[/COLOR]


There is a small luminous orb that dashes benieth the main object from left to right. These have also dashed undernieth the Space Shuttle just befor or after very convincing ET caft sightings that have baffled the crew... then the video is just down by Houston, NRO, NSA or?

[COLOR="Yellow"]
Again the things you claim to have seen could be of government projects.


******

Nope. I have seen BOTH. My main sighting WAS NOT government... the military intels would show up AFTER the events, stumbling over themselves, nearly crashing their unmarked choppers together. Years later I had tall blonde contact similiar as to what Miriam Delecado experienced, but I was not aboard a craft (others saw orange discs nearby... I saw flashes of light... then proceeded to have my mind blown... ultimatly for the better. I just finished a 300+ page book about it all and need to edit it down for publishing)


I need to close as I just got home after a very eventful (almost TOO eventful... threre's a party in the hills that is STILL going on!) New Years wing-ding.

Thank you for stimulating these trembling, post-temporal lobe siezure hands to work. Re; the brain thing. I WAS NOT having one at the time of my sightings or contact. To me, if that is suggested, it would be as offensive and redundant as the old "weather balloon/swamp gas/sleep paralysis" cop out.

Actually, I could use some good sleep paralysis (with the fear factor) right now.

May 2010 be a better year for us all,

Paul

PS. For those who have acess, go to my profile to see the kind of patch my uncle used to wear in the spookyland of western Nevada. I had my first off-the-consensual-radar experience there when I was about 10 years old.

PS.2. The Adams Family from Outer Space had a very difficult holiday season. The silence is DEAFENING.