Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
I think that 9-11 truth advocates should focus on continuing the initiative of spreading the word that the official story can't be true and that it is clear that the attacks were staged to further the New World Order agenda, and not engage in a debate about what technology was used. It doesn't matter!!
|
But it does matter. The devil is in the details. People want to know how it was done.
You wont convince anyone by just saying, "it was a false flag but you dont need to bother to look at the evidence, just take me at my word". You must present evidence. No plane theory and space based weapons theory can be refuted and are not provable 100%. What we DO have however is incontrivertibale evidence of explosives which we did not have 3 years ago. This has not been debunked and indeed is only getting stronger.
Show them the peer reviewed papers.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/
This is hard science and is the best chance of convincing a skeptical mind.
Also read these 2 amazing articles on how explosives could have easily been put into the trade centers and how Nano-thermite related companies had office space in the towers...
Demolition access to the World Trade Center towers: Part one - Tenants
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...90713033854249
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...90813150853871
Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Two - Security