this is the same ol' forum nonsense with mods and banning, it gets very old.
(and i totally agree she shouldnt have been banned)
the issue at hand is bill who i usually find reasonable, completely sidestepped answering cliff highs statement and went the extra step to call him and idiot and mis characterize cliff as "shouting from the mountaintops"
more and more it should be clear to everyone that bill and kerry (while having decent intentions) have a world view and an agenda to support that view regardless.
this means that they dont thoroughly research their "whistleblowers" nor do they even argue with them as long as it supports their view (whereas if someone differs they make themselves look petty and unprofessional as in the case with greer, a laughably bad and unprofessional interview)
the sad thing is for over a year they've driven and extremely paranoid "gloom and doom" world view. they will post every bit of non sense from sources they have never seen ( as in "hawkeye" who was saying the "roths' were all but taking over with martial law last year.)
i wasnt a fan of st clair but now i see he was level headed in distancing himself from B and K. what bugs me the most is that kerry specifically seems to have gotten a huge head over camelots popularity and genuinely thinks she is privy to the latest cutting edge info in the conspiracy world, yet if someone like Greer offhandedly mentions the PTB having a device that can materialize astral entities, she brushes past that little bit of info ive never heard before and lets her ego get into a pissing contest.
imagine if bill and kerry genuinely sought info regarding all these matters , we all would be privy to info that would let us be more informed and make up our OWN minds all the better. but no bill and kerry have a set agenda and if people like Cliff call into question the validity of their "witness" they will stand by them no matter how idiotic their claims are.
folks, no one is going to learn the whole picture , or very much if it ,by following camelot. kerry and bill want to believe we're at war with bad guy aliens and spiritually at war as well, they believe the same story youll find all over the net or in your local barnes n noble new age section, that our gov is in league with evil aliens and that reptillians are eating babies and that were headed for martial law and ultimate disaster. people who fall for this are getting half truths mixed with a truckload of BS.
if thats what you believe or want to believe, then camelot IS for you because they'll never deviate from that line of thought and they'll line up their mystery guests to support this view, even if they think they're moses and were offered to rule the planet as king "Penis of the Dragon" (thats what "pindar" means) yes thats straight from ol dr deagle himself.
in my opinion "camelot" via kerry and bill have a naive outlook thats ultimately negative and narrow minded and serves the agenda of the PTB perfectly. they have an inflated sense of importance by the hits their website receives and the cash given to them by regular folks with dayjobs to fly them all around the globe gathering what is essentially disinfo.
this rebuttal by cliff was at least an opportunity for them to stand and answer and admit they can be wrong about their "whistleblowers" or even just answer questions with integrity, instead it was a response that was evasive and immature.
this is the issue at hand, mod banning/power/rules aside.
http://superstrangeland.blogspot.com/