[Carol]

Both I and my husband listened to Miriam Delicado on Coast. First he was put off because she had said she had promised not to say anything about what the Hopi had shared with her but she thought they were wrong and she would share anyway. He thought her credibility went down the toilet with that comment that went out to millions of people. And he also realized that she talked, and talked, and talked without really saying anything we weren't already aware of. I suspect she is a nice person but she isn't the type of speaker I would spend any more time listening to because I don't find value in what she has to offer - specifically meaning, there isn't anything new being shared... it's all old hat.

As for Cliff High. I like Cliff but also have some reservations based on specific things he has said. He was a real supporter of Patrick Geryl and I tend to lean more toward the scientific presentation of LaViolette. When listening to Geryl I wonder where is the scientific method that he used to come up with his conslusions. As Cliff really likes Geryl it makes me wonder a bit about Cliff and his data. I suspect that Cliff's work was pretty much on target when they first started off but wondered if it has been contaminated by how fast info flows across the net and if their data gets out to compromise their data collection results. Irrespective of some of the confusing data collection I still enjoy listening to Cliff talk.