Quote:
Originally Posted by hollylindin
I just don't think it's about "better" or "worse" - I don't think any of this is. I think it's about what feels right to the person. Relying entirely on external evidence is an easy way for one to be less proactive in connecting to their inner self and finding what is really important on the inside. I feel all of this is just one big distraction.
<3
|
Well I most strongly disagree. It is about results. What bears out good and reliable results? Examining evidence, asking questions, getting answers, conducting experiments, checking results, or "how we feel about it"?
"How we feel about it" creates varied and unreliable results. The unvarnished neurological truth of the matter is "How we feel about it" has more to do with your blood sugar than about the truth of a given matter. I'm sorry, but that is just the reality of that business. Something I learned in what I now view as "the hard way". Everyone is welcome to learn it that way as well although I can't really recommend it.