Quote:
Originally Posted by eleni
Yes, I agree Initiate. A whistleblower must also remain open to other explanations as well even though he/she is certain XXX happened to them in such and such a way. Even in my experiences there are others who had similar/were used at same places etc; I remain open to alternate explanations. An example is shape shifting which many believe occurs- I am not convinced that was really happening because many times we were drugged and there exists technology to make you believe you are seeing something you really aren't.
|
eleni, those are my thoughts exactly. when i listened to arizona wilder's testimony regarding shapeshifting, the first thing i thought was 'but you were drugged!!!!'. i have not talked about a lot of the things i saw and experienced, because i know that when under the influence of hallucinogenic drugs, dissociated states, and whatever kinds of technology may have been used, my testimony is not credible. there are things i know beyond a shadow of a doubt, but the details may be different from those remembered by someone who was in the same room. but there are elements of other people's testimonies that ring absolutely true to me. i think that if we are able to take a step back we can easily see which whistleblowers are speaking from integrity. some of the people interviewed by PC strike me as being full of bologna. others of them, while i don't necessarily believe everything they are saying, i get the sense that THEY believe everything they are saying. for me, that's the difference. i have respect for those who are speaking the truth as they know it. they are giving us pieces of the truth to add to our puzzle. i have NO respect for those who are spewing bull that i can tell even THEY don't believe.