Hi Phtha,
The Camelot Website was set upto INTERVIEW people and let them get their story out.
More recently the site carried a disclaimer saying that the site owners do not necessarily agree with everything being said.
This last six months or so, both site owners have been stepping beyond the bounds of the object of the site, with criticisms of several 'professionals' of the area.
My area of profession is music. I would never say to another professional musician that I think they're ****. I would just keep quiet and say nothing. It's the politically correct thing to do within the professional area (even because you will get more enemies than friends if you're caught slagging people off publicly).
I think the Camelot name this year has had it rough and it may be a good idea to assess damage control to make 2010 better for the 'brand'.
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phtha
My opinions on this.. if anyone cares. 
Calling people (in this case Cliff) "dumb" and "idiot" as Bill has done in both his original post and his response is an action fueled by ego for the ego. Insults do not exist otherwise.
It worked as cliff had to defend himself, and who can blame him?
Both Cliff and Bill are voices I respect and I find it unfortunate that people who are on the same side (at least on the surface) are turning against one another.
This is of course... the old divide and conquer. So my question is, who is the third party who has started this ancient wheel to turn? There is one involved, have no doubt. Is it Deagle himself? I dare not guess.... 
I also don't agree with Bills stance on defending his whistleblowers. I think the whistle blowers words should speak for themselves, and they (thanks to the internet) have many methods to defend themselves should the need arise.
Love you guys both! But I really think there is a 3rd here causing this friction... is it ever any other way?  |