Quote:
Originally Posted by Karen
No I did not mean anything about Rense. I doubt he followed the events, so he can't read the fingerprints all over the piece. I'm talking about who wrote it and I think from all the other signs this is just the beginning steps of a concerted campaign to take down Camelot.
Here's a perfect example of how outsiders to the event cannot be relied upon to give an accurate analysis.
...Several of our members do and for sure Bill Ryan who knows far more of the history of the proceeding events knows who wrote it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
This quote from "Bill Ryan's thread" on Page 16, Post #389 is regarding this Rense piece:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
Is it possible that Rense thought the article in question was actually about the Army's Project Camelot? Thus, it would not be a smear piece at all?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Ryan
I'm afraid it was a smear piece. It was written by (wait for it) Dr Richard Sauder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
Can someone tell me who Dr Richard Sauder is?
|
|
|
|
|
I've had some time to get over my headache.
I guess what has happened is that Sauder wrote a hit piece from or using information from Burisch's camp and Rense thought it was news about a U.S. Army program.