Quote:
Originally Posted by beren
But search for evidence instead of second hand facts found in the mainstream.
|
I think a guy lived, that was in the line of David, that was a kingdom of god zealot in a movement to overthrow Roman rule, and the Romans crucified him.
The evidence is that it's a made up story, because like I say, Paul didn't breathe a word about Jesus teachings or his virgin birth, or his life story at all.
All Paul taught was the CONCEPT of messiah, what it meant, and he TOTALLY disagreed with the apostles, and the "church" from day one has been a conflict ridden mess.
Since what happened at the tomb is completely different, factually, in one gospel than it is in another, OBVIOUSLY someone is making stuff up, right???? Right. Somebody made it up, just like somebody made up what he said on the cross.
My thinking is that it is ALL made up. The gist, what happened on the cross, and at the tomb, was rumored, and so the rumors spread and became sort of different, one form the other.
If it was the word of God in any way whatsoever, it would not conflict. You can't say it's inspired, but has conflicting accounts of actual bellweather events.
It's just that kind of swampy talk and blurring of lines that makes the religion like a virus, kind of, where no matter what you say about it, it mutates.
No two people understand it the same, so you can't address it.
But my story proves it false.
