No conversation is private. Being in this field or research you may have heard this, Debugged. Or maybe not. Maybe you like to call people out only, seeing as hardcore you got from only 8 posts so far. No offense, but as you said, whats a bystander going do when they feel that the whistleblower
MIGHT not fully (or more fully) understand. (In other words, I have as good a reason as you to reply to you in this manner). I am trying to show you why its okay to be calm in this matter: No conversation is private. These consciousness aided technologies and technology aided consciousness can easily penetrate ANYTHING EMF-related anyway. PRobably using scalar (Radionics, Energetics, "self-targeting" atomic memory for information, etc)
So I think Mr. King would understand this Being in the PLF labs themselves! However, I do not KNOW Mr. King. I have seen all about his experience though from his interview with CSETI (youtube). Plus, I study Dr. Steven Greer and Dr. Thomas Bearden's work and testimony. Being a CSETI/Disclosure Project witness he may unstand the technology quite well at this point related to "privacy" even being REAL in teh accept form we call it "private" in the West! LOL. However, that doesn't mean THEWATCHER is any less legally liable. I do not know that particular law. BUT, COULD YA HOOOK IT UP PLEASE.
I am just requesting: please calm down because
maybe there is a reason your paradigm could change (the law you steadfastly pushed on this thread may not be accepted reality soon, but it still is, I see this too). It wasn't personal information that would do ANY MORE harm than what they know all about already anyway. They being the black-ops community involved in protecting their interests.
Maybe I understand this differently than most.
~Blessings To You All~