Quote:
Originally Posted by burgundia
I just hope it won't create a mess. i still remember how it was before subscription....a lot of "individuals" liked hanging around trying to lower the vibrations of the site....
|
Lower vibration? How? Can you give a few examples?
----
The 5 or 10 dollar subscription is...small. Converted to EUR is even smaller. 5$ is like going to a store to buy 230grams of bread and 0,5l yogurt.
And also it is a nice filter. I might be wrong but if I understand correctly they wish to get more people on the forum hoping there will be more donations? That might not be true, since people can already see and read the forum without paying for it.
If not. What is the reason?
Large number of people is a larger variety of thoughts but that is not always a good thing.
I myself would be much happier to have Bill and Kerry contributing on this forum or to have someone representing them on this forum (moderators are not that) and -if possibly- to have the people they interview on this forum. Would subscription than cost more? Ok...I am willing to pay a reasonable monthly fee to see quality discussions, fact backed arguments, inside information... and I think it would be a good idea - bringing all the people in one place.
EDIT:
They are also asking on how to increase the revenue. This might sound "idiotic" but how about - try not to?
Money has more sh** attached to it than anything else on this planet. My idea is to find people that would volunteer their time, knowledge and skills. Yes it is a Utopia-idea but why not try and start it? It has been put off far too long and the what is called "basic laws" are supporting this idea - attraction, intent, allowance, balance. Or am I wrong?