[gscraig]

This is true indeed Malletzky.
This is also expressed at the beginning of the book. They more specifically referred to James Randi who was a Nostradamus debunker.
James Randi expressed the same sentiment that Nostradamus predictions are veiled in such obsure symbolism, that they could mean anything and that interpretations are impossible in the absence of precision in language.

Yet, the book was published based on using cutting edge data mining techniques and the information from clients in deep trance states of being that "in their opinion" provides more specifics including date range for many of the events.
Now granted, this could be just to sell books, but it was inexpensive and of interest to read, and now share.

I will post some more quatrains shortly. It also list a few decoded events that has occurred in the past.