[Bloodoftheberry]

Like many spiritually-inclined people, I have a strong belief in the concept of the 'lifeplan' (the idea that our spirits outline the central and catalysing moments of our life prior to incarnation, based on free will and karmic consideration). I also strongly believe in the concept of oneness, which I regard as the objective truth and that all 'truths' thereafter are illusory, since they relate to this inherently illusory game (or matrix, depending on your perspective) called life.

If you resonate with what I have summarised above, then I wish to share with you a theory that I have recently devised:

What if our intuitive resonances are contextualised by our lifeplan?

In other words, what if the thoughts and theories we resonate and don't resonate with (particularly those concerning metaphysical and philosophical issues) are influenced, indeed governed, by our preincarnative parameters?

For example, the incarnation of a spirit that chose a life as a Scientologist will resonate (or eventually resonate) with the cult's doctrine, regardless of its objective truthfulness. Even though Hubbard's doctrines may seem like obvious misinformation to most of us, that particular incarnation (and thousands others like him) will, upon reading them, receive the same inner warmth, that same essence of conviction, that we felt when we read the theories of, for instance, David Icke or Fritz Springmeier. His intuition confirmed to him the truth of something that is untruthful - not out of a desire to mislead, but because his spiritual compass is magnetised by a lifeplan whose goals are driven by a quest for something other than objective truth. Indeed, an understanding and embracement of objective truth may prove detrimental to the achievements and understandings his current lifeplan intends him to cultivate.

Sure, many of our intuitive resonances as a collective are almost universal and consistent, particularly in relation to morality and ethics. Most of us are likely to feel extreme discouragement if, for example, we contemplate murdering someone with whom we have a strong electrochemical attraction, such as our parents or children. 'Big', morality-related decisions as these are commonly accompanied by strong, unequivocal intuitive messages that define the ethical majority. But what about those who are heavily service to self-oriented, and interpret pain as pleasure?

I am not saying that we cannot rely on our intuition to guide us towards objective truth and away from disinformation, misinformation and subjective noise. Contrariwise, that's its ultimate purpose. But I think that it can only help us do so once we have reached a degree of spiritual maturation, a point whereby our spirits can begin to outline lives based upon the pursuit of objective truth (which, as previously stated, is oneness - in my opinion).

If you have concluded within this lifetime that absolute truth cannot be subjective, and you are actively discerning the misinformation that permeates this world, then I doubt that your intuitive resonances are subjectivised by third density baggage. There are exceptions, of course, such as 'awakened' (and usually religious) people who still believe that the messiah is someone external to themselves. In this regard, they still resonate with an objectively incorrect perspective, as their respective lifeplans probably intended.

But I think that as 2012 - and the subsequent dismantlement of the New Word Order - approaches, more and more people will awaken to realise that their current lives (and thus, by extension, the lifeplans thereof) are ultimately fuelled by the quest for absolute truth. Spiritually ready to resonate with the concepts of oneness and unconditional love, such people will begin to see not only the forest from the trees, but the macrocosm from the forest. And the role of their intuitions in this venture is, of course, paramount.