Hi TheObserver,
I never stated that I wanted the 'birthers' claims to be true. I merely brought an article to the forum which was about a court case which for several times and reasons been refused to be heard in a court of law, not because of merit, but because of technicalities.
Once the thing is dealt with, it will bring the subject to a conclusion.
But which ever way one looks at it, for a person to spend nearly $2 million to keep basic information from being made public - I fill out more information when I joined Facebook or MySpace - it does draw attention to the case. Does it not?
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheObserver
So why do you guys want the birthers claims to be true? Or do you want the birthers to prevail true or not?
|