Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthWillSetUFree
As I continue to seek discernment with the whistleblowers, Bill Deagle, IMO, is not a credible source, for me.
I had also heard he is a paid CIA disinfo agent from Clif High, who again, IMO is more credible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
I'm not as familiar with Clif High as I am other sources.
What does he state as his rationale for his opinion about Dr Bill?
Quote:
Originally Posted by franciejones
Clif Specifically says that Deagle and burisch are "non-starters" in his data gathering which means that what they say does not resonate OR simply put, that they are lying. Hope that helps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seashore
Okay thanks.
Maybe I can find it on his website.
|
|
|
|
I have tried to find information about how "non-starters' are identified on Clif High's website
Half Past Human. He talks about "asymetric language trend analysis" for future viewing but I don't see anything about identifying non-starters as part of what he does.