[anonypony]

Dear Zorgon and all

You have raised many important questions and flagged up even more interesting information... Thanks for taking the time to educate us all...
I would like to relate to what you wrote and would be glad to hear your views. (All of you)

Here we go

1) He confessed... he should have plead 'not guilty' then they would have had to bring proof... bad move on his part

You are very right on this one. Here is what happened: When the police raided Gary's home in the middle of the night and arrested him, they have also arrested his girl friend at the time (T). Gary was very concerned about (T) being jailed, as she had nothing to do with what he was doing. He was told they would let her go if he confessed!!!!! He asked what would be the penalty if he confessed and was told - max 6 month community service. At the time he DID NOT THINK OF HIMSELF (which is typical Gary by the way). He did not think he needed a lawyer either. HE TRUSTED THEM...

That is why and how he came to fess up to his actions.
STUPID? YES! He would be the first to admit that now!

I am being told, that this kind of behaviour of rescuing others to one's own detriment and overly trusting... is typical to those with Asbergers Syndrome...

3) Gary's computer skills... "He should be thanked and given a job..."For what? because he randomly looked for open password computers?

That is very true too. Gary himself has always emphasised this fact! He always dismissed claims of being particularly skilled in the art of hacking and maintains any kid with basic computer skills could do what he did.

2) WHY did Britain give in so easy on this case? THAT needs to be looked at... have they done this before? If not why this time?

That is the million dollar question... And I, like many others who are watching this case unfold, wonder endlessly... I can only speculate and here is what I think:

In order to explore this question we would do well to put this case in the context of it's TIMING. Although Gary maintains he has been exploring those networks for over 2 years before being detected, he was arrested shortly after 911. Regardless of what views one takes on who were the perpetrators of this event, we can not dispute it's role as a fundamental linchpin in the transformation of our reality beyond recognition from that point on.

Far more interesting question here is WHY THE USA ADMINISTRATION WANTS HIM SO BADLY? What and who’s agenda this case would further and help cement into reality?

From there on we can ask, Is the British Government a fully consenting party to this agenda? Or was the British Government, or individuals members of it compromised, blackmailed, or coerced to implement changes to the UK law system, which will help facilitate that agenda later on?

It is my observation that the legislation process is often pre-empting the agenda it aims to serve by at least 10 years. Often a test case is brought forward, shortly after the new laws or bills are passed to make sure there are no unforeseen loop holes. If undesirable loop holes are found, amendments are introduced, way before those laws are really needed to be used for some agenda or another...

I believe Gary's case was viewed as such a test case to begin with.

There are many views regarding the ‘WHY THE USA ADMINISTRATION WANTS HIM SO BADLY’ question.
Many in the UFO community maintain it is to do with where he has been and what he has seen. That might be the case or maybe part of it. However Gary, initially was not talking at all about what he has seen. He only started talking about it in public interviews, when he could see no hope...

I think LIMITING THE FREEDOM ON AND OF THE INTERENT was one of the agendas this case was aimed to serve. In hindsight this has been achieved already, without Gary’s case even going to trial!!!!

It is also my observation that the minions of those who own this world often TELL US IN ADVANCE AND OPENLY WHAT THE PLAN IS! No wonder they think we are all stupid sheeple, ‘they tell us exactly what they are doing right to our face and we still don’t get it!’

I recall watching the news on the evening of that monumental day Sep 11, G Bush senior was televised giving a speech to some business conference. Out of all the things he could have said on this day and out of all the things he did say, this is what was televised (in the UK) He said - This event will change the way you use the internet for ever, it is too free and needs to be limited.

Needless to say the freedom we enjoyed using the internet pre 911 is but a faded memory now! And not just that freedom...

In the UK, pretty much anyone working in local council, can look into any aspect of an individual’s means of communication, without a court order! This includes emails, web browsing, telephone conversations - on line, mobile, or land lines, and snail mail too. Under the guise of terror legislation and despite huge public opposition, this is now a reality.

If you look at how this has been used so far? You will find it was also used against a normal family, registering their kids to a desirable local school.Their emails were accessed by their local council on suspicion that they have lied on a school application form and to check if they indeed lived within the catchment's area of this school.

I also think that limiting the freedom we used to have using the internet, is but a small part of a bigger agenda, which goes something like this:

THERE IS NO WHERE TO HIDE! OUR EVERY MOVE COULD BE RESTRICTED AND IS MONITORED AND, WE ARE WILLINGLY TO PAY FOR THE PREVELAGE!

This agenda has already been fulfilled, save the biometrics ID, which is still to come worldwide.

Talking of pre-emptive legislation, please look into the changes to bankruptcy laws introduced (in the USA) in the last few years and, how relevant it suddenly became due to the current financial climate!!!! Those changes may also explain the rapid expansion of the building of boot camps/concentration camps/ work camps, what ever you want to call them.

Back to our subject, saying all of this, I don’t dismiss for a moment the possibility, that what Gary has seen on his cyber visits to those networks, is something that the PTB are willing to defend at all cost, in order to keep it secret.

Bevan’s Case, which was highlighted in one of my earlier posts and more recently by Kerry’s post may explain partly, why Gary was never charged in the UK. Beyond the fact that those who arrested him and had access to his computer, were satisfied that he was not a terrorist and he did not inflict any damages. It is possible, that Bevan case demonstrated the LOOP HOLES and Gary’s case was to be used to close all those loop holes. This may also explain why this case has been such a ‘work in progress’ in terms of moving the legal goal post...