Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunner
I've only watched the first few minutes of this so far, but already I see flaws in the debunking argument. Specifically, the use of the full passage from Isiah 13:5
"They come from a far country, from the end of heaven, [even] the LORD, and the weapons of HIS indignation, to destroy the whole land."
Throughout the Bible the use of the word LORD is misleading. In the original Hebrew text the word is ELOHIM, which is a combination of masculine and feminine. It is also PLURAL not singular. The translation we have today is roughly ELOHIM = SINGULAR GOD = LORD. A more correct translations would be ELOHIM = PLURAL MASCULINE AND FEMININE GODS = THE GODS.
So the translation would then be "They come from a far country, from the end of heaven, [even] the GODS, and the weapons of THEIR indignation, to destroy the whole land."
|
http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchinerrors.htm#elohim
http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/dc101elohim.pdf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunner
So if anything this strengthens Tsarion's arguement. Remember that the standard version of the Bible is the Authorised King James version, i.e. the version that King James wanted us to read. I believe the penalties were severe if you were caught with a version he didn't want you to read.
|
http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/article...ng%20James.pdf
I believe that, that bible is written by the Rosicrucian Francis Bacon but I can't remember where I found that. Let's just think of this as an opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunner
Anyhoo, the bottom line is that all information is suspect, no matter who the source is. When people such as Tsarion and Watt get up and present information to people they do so coming from a position of their own beliefs. It was summed up really well by Robert Anton Wilson when he said "What the thinker thinks, the prover proves." Set out to prove that ET's have been here for millennia and you will, at least to your own satisfaction. Set out to prove that they haven't and you will, at least to your own satisfaction.
It's YOUR OWN EXPERIENCES that count, not what anybody else tells you. We need to stop relying solely on our masculine, logical left-brain THINKING and start opening up to our feminine, intuitive right-brain KNOWING. If we rely too much on either one we get lost- over-use of logic leads to dead materialism and over-use of intuition leads to believing anything that floats into out minds because we don't critically examine it.
Personally, since I started following my intuition I've found it far more reliable than logic. It points me in the right direction and then my logical mind comes in to sift through the information.
A balance of the two is essential.
|
Yes. I can agree on that but the right brain or so to speak emotion based knowing can be biased. Which happened a lot of times to me before and proven me wrong. 'Knowing' or well 'gnosis' perhaps can be bent with outside influence since it can be shaped into a reality in the brain. Cold facts are much more fun to handle imho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunner
Much respect to all here, I'll watch more of this stuff and see where it goes. Thanks for the links guys. 
p.s. Not shouting when I use CAPITAL letters, it's just that for some reason I have real difficulty making italics, underlining etc work on these forums. I must be doing something wrong but I haven't a clue what that might be. |
I would recommend (if you've got the time of course) that you check out the sources of my and your claims. Who they are and why they would write such claims (is it based on fact or opinion?). Hope it will lead us to a better form of knowing. Respect to you too Sunrunner and take care.
Caps-lock sucks btw
