Quote:
Originally Posted by TheObserver
I agree 246, however the figure i heard is the top 1% have as much money as the bottom 95%.
Then they say raising taxes on these 'job creators' will cost jobs.
What does their personal tax liability have to do their companies bottom line?
The law should be written so these 'fat-cats' have to personally 'eat it' and not take it out on their employees.
If they have to trade their new BMWs in for used Chevys or send their kids to state college rather than Yale so be it.
Again i advocate an everything is free, nobody gets paid system based on volunteerism and following your bliss rather than marketability and unsustainable consumerism.
|
Ya that would be great. Although for today's rich it would be more like trading in their Bugattis for BMWs instead of BMWs for Chevs. They only say that it would cost jobs because the rich are so greedy and so concerned about keeping the little guy down. Because if we were to rise financially, even a little, the rich would start to lose control and it would threaten the future of their vast wealth. A wealth that is only insured by keeping us down as much as possible. It's all about control.