Hi Viking,
Yes, I do find it fascinating. I really enjoyed the Hoagland interviews and have looked at some of the photos on his site..and the Bob Dean pictures are also pretty impressive.
Thanks also for the links, I took a look.
I love the hexagonal base on the moon. That looks the most convincing. But why one such large structure...and no others, from horizon to horizon? And why hexagonal ? These are the questions I ask myself. And why is the moon pink in this instance, whereas in hoaglands authentic 'natural' photo of the moon it seems to show greens and blues and greys.
Also , why all the prophetic music, and the slow-reveal captions on that first video ? (this kind of music is starting to really bug me!
) I mean, it's a good ten mintue vid with some interesting points. But why do so many of these 'reveals' have to be so dramatic, when the evidence is either very clear cut - like the hexagonal bases...or the martian fields, or this alien here... (which came off a related link to your first video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAt0yBHZgMM&NR=1
I mean, is that an alien , or is that not
definitely an alien. Looks like one to me.
...or kind of 'wishy-washy' (for want of a better term). I mean... that statue of tutan-kamun ?
I wonder why we find the conclusive looking evidence so 'hard' to believe, like, have you seen this for example?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3iE1ErS8GE&NR=1
and the vague towers and structures (that have to be highlighted or turned upside down to make them look like something interesting) so easy?
Again, only two or three such structures in an entire landscape. I'd have thought if you're going to build, build...
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I don't believe there's something, or the eyewitness testimonies. What I find truly amazing, is that , given all the sources, that there isn't better evidence ! If you see what I mean...
Maybe you're right, I need to look at more images till I find some I find convincing...
K