View Single Post
Old 09-24-2009, 11:03 AM   #198
James Casbolt
Avalon Senior Member
 
James Casbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 867
Default Re: Project IBIS and Looking Glass disclosures

Note: The individuals at safehouses in Brighton and London do not represent MI-6 or the NSA as a whole. These are individuals which have infiltrated these powerful organisations under control from A.I computer systems.
Quote from 2002 EDH report entitled 'A secret war in Afghanistan'-

'Their military stratergy ( non-human 'slavers' ) was "asymmetrical", which means they knew they couldn't previal by fighting U.S forces head on. So they would hide in populated areas'

and

'Considering the enemy at hand, this was a good risk, as had come to light in the top secret NSA reports of 1979 concerning what was taking place at secret facilities in the American southwest ( see EDH reports: summer 2001: "The battle of Dulce" ) , that caused the famous NSA department "Z" raid on enemy earth stations ( The NSA attacked non-humans which had taken over the facility- Michael Prince ), there seem to be types of otherworlders who are more interested in the use of humans as "cows" and "food" than equals. This could be seen clearly in some of the interveiws with suvivors of the fight taking place around Gardez in february of 2002.
While it seemed to be another type of "civil-war" battle between human factions, it covered effectively the rescue operations that were then going on in the mountians to the east of the city. The fighting gave new urgency to Afghan interim leader Hamid Karzai's appeal for an expanded security international security force to be deployed outside the capital, Kabul, to stave off factional conflicts. Karzai, who stopped in Britain en-route home from a vist to the United States, met with Prime Minister Tony Blair and said there was overwhelming support among Afghans for a widening of the peacekeeping mission. "It's a demand of the Afghan people as a measure of commitment by the international commuinity, as a symbol of their commitment to Afghanistan to stay on", he said in a statement that had clear overtones of problems greater than simply policing his own citizens. The fact was that, Karzai understood the suffering his people had faced under attack by an unworldy enemy that he wasn't allowed to talk about for fear of death- remembering as well, that a 'final' answer would be for the Americans to do what the Russians had done- use atomic bombs to wipe out any trace of the invaders.
The problem was that in Afghanistan the 'gates' were so close to large human populations that millions of people would die if the U.S went such a way. At the this time of writing, the major threat of unworldy invaders seems to have been crushed, yet again, by human forces, it is not known how many of the enemy survive in the mountains of Afghanistan, Tajkistan and Pakistan, or if they have saved even one of their hidden bases. It is known that all of the so called 'gates' in Central Asia have either been retaken by humans or they have been destroyed. Yet again, human military forces have proved that their special operations organisations had what it took to stand up against such an enemy. Will there be another such attack? Very likely.
The question will be, can human military forces continue to find paths to victory when the human population of the planet has little idea what horrors we are really facing?'

'
__________________
"The future isn't what it used to be Mr Angel"

From the film

'Angel Heart'

Last edited by James Casbolt; 09-24-2009 at 11:05 AM.
James Casbolt is offline   Reply With Quote