Quote:
Originally Posted by happyhollergal
I just wish that Kerry could develop the art of non-interruptive courtesy and become a more polished, professional speaker/interviewer. I have been on another forum where I don't post, but have seen numerous posts where people have decided that they don't like Camelot because of Kerry's "interviewing style". On the other hand, I always read praises about what Bill says and his behavior, and I agree that Bill has a nicer touch. I suppose what I'm trying to say is that Camelot may be able to attract larger numbers of people, which would result in more financial support, if the approach were different. Compared to the number of followers that other groups have (such as Exopolitics, MUFON, etc.) the numbers are way low for Camelot. We can help spread the word about what B&K are doing, but we have to have something that sells itself when people take time to view it.
|
Kerry is not going to change her style of interrupting. I've heard her explain it twice now, once on whistleblower radio and once at the conference. She says - but understand these are my pick of words to paraphrase her - people ramble along with their stories in this programmed mode, and the interruptions break that program and she can get deeper into things not ordinarily revealed. This is a studied approach that works for her and she is doing it intentionally. Bill and Kerry say if you don't like their style there are plenty of other people out there to listen to, such as Conscious Media network, that use the traditional "non-interruptive courtesy and more polished, professional speaker/interviewer" style. They get plenty of kudos for doing what they do they way they do it and she is not changing.