View Single Post
Old 09-17-2008, 09:06 PM   #71
Rocky_Shorz
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
Default Re: [UNVERIFIED] US To Declare October ‘Economic Emergency’, Suspend Elections

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyd View Post
ANTE TODO MI POST ERA PARA HACERLES VER QUE ES MUCHO MEJOR SI NO ESTAN DE ACUERDO CON ALGUNA DISPOSICION DE SU GOBIERNO SALIR A LAS CALLES Y PROTESTAR, ACUERDENSE QUE USTEDES PAGAN TAXES Y QUE DE ESO TAXES SON PAGADOS SUS GOBERNANTES, OSEA ELLOS TRABAJAN PARA USTEDES, Y COBRAN SU SUELDO POR SUS TAXES, OSEA QUE USTEDES TIENEN TODO EL DERECHO DE PROTESTAR SI SUS GOBERNANTES QUIEREN HACER ALGO QUE USTEDES NO QUIEREN AQUI EN EL PERU LA PROTESTA POPULAR HACE QUE NUESTRO GOBIERNO DE MARCHA ATRAS SI NO VEAN LAS NOTICIAS DE BILIVIA SU PUEEBLO VA HA CONSEGUIR QUE EL GOBIERNO DE MARCHA ATRAS CON SUS DECRETOS QUE EL PUEBLO NO LOS QUIERE, NO ESTOY REFIRIENDO A LA VIOLENCIA SINO A UNA PROTESTA PACIFICA PERO EN DONDE ELPUEBLO RECHAZA LO QUE SU GOBERNANTE QUIERE HACER.


Translation:

First and foremost, my post was to make you see that it is much better, if you disagree with some government regulation, to take to the streets and protest. Remember it is your tax money that pays the salaries of government employees, and that they work for you. You have every right to protest if the government does something you don't want. Here in Peru popular protest has made our government back off of decrees that the people don't want. I'm not referring to violence, but to peaceful protest wherein the people reject what the government wants to do.

-scottyd
Thank you Scotty,

Maybe we should all move to Peru...
Rocky_Shorz is offline   Reply With Quote