[Fredkc]

Last I looked there are about 50 sessions on the interview page.
Is this one different? You bet! So what?
Did Kerry have an agenda? Yup.
"Irresistible force meets immovable object." If you want fawning and pablum, every time, Larry King is on 6 nights a week.

The one that seemed to stick in her craw, sticks in mine as well; the notion that they must all be good, or benign because:

If the ET's wanted to be hostile in any way shape or form we would have been fried by now!!!

Sorry, it don't work. The easiest, and most base of reasons that spring to mind would be:
"Does a rancher shoot every animal that resists being corralled ?"
Not very smart, and you won't be a rancher long.

I feel the danger lies in Kerry's position - in that a negative outlook allows for the possibility of a negative outcome.

Item 1: See the previous post concerning the Inca's and Spaniards.

Item 2: From the link above, Discerning Alien Disinfo:

We should not think about negative aliens because what we focus upon, we energize and attract.

This is a misapplication of the Law of Attraction. While we do attract what we become obsessed with or emotionally invested in, the converse is not true that we repel what we ignore. While ignoring something removes the force of attraction, it can still manifest by chance or through its own free will.

An aside here, by way of an old saying: "The only things that go away by ignoring them are your teeth."

Going further:
This time/place we inhabit wasn't created for us. We co-create it in conjunction with, not only other humans, but all sentient/creative beings who share it.

Now whether others are here, to help, conquer, hinder, or some mix, they are here.
If the notion we are SO beneath them, and so repulsive holds true, AND that what you ignore "goes away" then the simple answer is to just leave us to our misery.

Pointless to argue whether they are more intelligent, or advanced really, because based upon the previous statement it's clear they either can't, or won't leave "the great wheel" we all inhabit. That means they have various perceived needs (or call it the "fear of lack"), they satisfy here. That means that in some very basic terms "they is us" and this means intentions from good, to benign to worse. How does keeping them in the unknown category benefit us?

As to:

Dr. Greer holds some extreme responsibility towards what direction people decide to head in if and when they find out ET's are real.

Hubris. He cannot take on that responsibility for anyone but himself, nor can any of us. If the idea that removing illusion, for a closer glimpse at true intention is too dangerous for the species, then we truly are cattle, in need of management. I don't buy that.