Quote:
Originally Posted by tone3jaguar
If the people who would disapprove of the information had the opportunity to edit the information by way of Peterson before it was released then how is that risking anything? I do not get it, how is this guy giving the perception that he has released anything that would put him in danger other than the smoke and mirrors about not releasing the video for 2 months?
|
I agree this is a very sound point.What risk? Why did he not just be a whistle-blower anonymously and tell the whole story instead of part, of a non story out in the open?
Once gain though I giving him the benefit of the doubt for now and wait for some solid information based on provable or replicative evidence.
Regards
Baron