Quote:
Originally Posted by Jnana
I think Bill is justified in viewing the article as directed implicitly at their Project Camelot even though the descriptions of how Project Camelot evolved are far from accurate and whole name thing is coincidental. I don't see why he wants to draw even more attention to this lame piece of work by responding to it. I think the aim of the piece is to discredit whistleblowers in general, and some recent or soon to be whistleblowers in particular. Somebody struck a nerve. B&K should take the existence of such an article as recognition of a job well done!
|
I agree it is clearly aimed at Project Camelot and Bill and Kerry--although it is badly written and not at all persuasive.